After much consideration, this morning, i decided it was worth it to venture down to Pakuranga, to visit the local laptop fixer man. One hundred and twenty dollars later, i was back home, with a flash new keyboard installed on my laptop - minus all the crumbs that were stuck in the old one. I then proceeded to spend much of my day, reading the blog of the woman that Dr. Peter Jansen has threatened legal action against.
I had not paid attention to this story, and probably wouldn't have, had people not emailed me after hearing the tail end of what's his face's silly rant regarding bloggers, on his show yesterday. The closest i have ever come to having dealings with ACC are the forms that you fill in when your child requires stitches, or more recently when i managed to bang my tooth against the lid of my laptop which resulted in a chipped tooth. I have always just paid their surcharges, and then received a lovely letter in the mail a few weeks later, reminding me of the incident, by way of notifying me that my claim had been accepted. Sooo, any headline that has anything to do with ACC does not really jump out and grab my attention.
I am not sure what to think, after reading her blog. There is a lot of anger there, in some posts, and in some of the comments. ACC and Dr. Jansen are not the only people, or organisation that have been on the receiving end of her anger. It is also very clear though, that she is an intelligent woman, who possesses a fantastic sense of humour.
Part of me thinks that anger is understandable, if she has been the victim of child sex abuse. But then another part of me, as i kept reading, thought to myself - this woman is / has let something that happened so long ago, control her whole life for so long, and it is time for her to stop being a victim. It is time for her to stop empowering her abuser by spending so much of her life focusing on something that happened, that cannot be changed. It almost seems like her whole life is consumed by the subject. I can't help but wonder if she would just stop thinking of herself as a "victim" then maybe she would not require as much counselling as she thinks she needs? From what i understand she has already undergone ten years worth of counselling...if that hasn't worked then perhaps it is time for a different approach to her finding the happiness that it is clear has eluded her, so far in life.
I don't know. It's a tough one. That is not really why i am writing about this subject tonight though. I am writing about it, because i found the blog post in question, that Dr Jansen is threatening to sue her over, rather funny. There are a lot worse posts about him, throughout the blog, and it is obvious that this particular one, is just ...well...funny.
What is even funnier, is that none of us would have ever read it, had Dr Jansen not made his silly legal threat. I also found it rather amusing that it had been reported that she had been served legal papers, been contacted by lawyers, and been told to remove the blog post in question - while she states that none of that has occurred. I absolutely believe her regarding this, as i too have had it reported in the media that i was contacted by lawyers, and was going to be sued...oh sorry " i am definitely taking legal action...what that legal action will be, i don't know"...i think was what was said at the time haha...when i had heard absolutely nothing from lawyers, and the person who said that had spent the previous day begging, lying, and apologising to me.
The thing here though is this...she stated her opinion of her experience in dealing with Dr Jansen, on her own blog. If that is defamation, then isn't anything negative that is said about anyone on the internet also defamation? Of course when we read negative comments and remarks about ourselves anywhere...none of us are going to like it, or agree with them. Personally, i have just gotten used to it, and have learned to laugh at them - or even better - i just don't. Read. Them.
There are web forums and blogs galore, that are full of people trashing other people's 'reputations' ...my own included. You don't have to look any further than the Trademe Message boards to find people banging on about how much they dislike someone, and their reasons why. The only difference here, is that she is doing it on her own little corner of the worldwide web, instead of someone else's - which actually makes it less damaging because until Dr Jansen threatened to sue her - only about 15 people actually read her blog.
My big question here...is why has no one ever sued anyone over this kind of thing? Or have they, and we just haven't heard about it? I always thought that i was safe, because i have never lied. There is so much more that i could say, and that i know, but because it is not my first hand experience, but rather information that has come to me through 3rd parties, i don't write about it. I don't not write about it because i don't believe what i have been told. I absolutely believe the things that i have been told about a certain person. I don't write about it though, because i can't prove it, or i was not there to witness it, or experience it, myself....and i don't want to get sued. Maybe there is more to it than that though. Maybe you just can't sue someone for defamation, in relation to something they have said on the internet, and to threaten to do so just makes you look like a plonker?
Perhaps the moral of this story is to always take my Dad's advice that he gave me as a teenager, that i should have always listened to, but didn't until these last couple of years - Never do or say anything that you would not want on the front page of the newspaper. I have said it before, and i will say it again...that seemed like pretty extreme advice back in the 80s, but these days, it seems like our own names can end up being that front page of that newspaper, once someone types them into Google.
People don't just go around looking for someone to "defame" for no reason... Do good. Live a good life that you are proud of. Treat others not only how you would want to be treated, but also consider how THEY want to be treated... and i doubt any of us will have reason to cringe if we google our names. Seems too simple though huh? Maybe that is because it just... is.
I doubt that Dr. Jansen would have been the target of "Jax's" anger, had he done this. She might still be mad at ACC, but i doubt he personally, would have been in the firing line.
To "Jax" - Forgiveness is an attribute of the strong - only the weak cannot forgive. Truly forgiving might help you more than a million dollars worth of counselling. xxx
And finally - Whale Oil's advice is probably advice that we should all heed - NFWAB - Never F*ck With A Blogger! ;)




6 comments:
If you are so down with forgiveness then why do you always comment about ML on blogs and sites around the place??
Also Jax is not the only one who thinks Dr. Jansen is a CIP. It will be harder for him to prove he isn't than it will be to prove he is.
Remember too her counselling was recommended by the police as she was about to endure a trial. Have you been to trial for that? It is awful! Maybe if the Government funded the police better they would be in the position to offer counselling themselves rather than having to call on ACC.
I have spent many years coming to terms with the fact that there are many people that I needed to forgive. ML was not one of them. I did not allow him to hurt me. He is though, a liar, and a nasty piece of work that i never want to see back in National Politics therefor i will always speak out about my dislike of him, for that very reason - especially in support of someone that he is using or lying about in order to boost his dwindling ratings and profile. I commented on Jax's blog because i can imagine how awful it would have been for her to hear her ex husband lying about her on air, and for ML to allow that kind of personal crap on to his show just again, proves what kind of character he has...or lacks.
No...i have never been to trial for anything. I can imagine that kind of trial would be awful, and i can imagine that some kind of support would be required.
I don't question Jax's opinion of Dr Jansen. In fact i have stated that had he treated her with respect, and in a manner that we all deserve to be treated then he probably would not have ended up in the firing line of her anger. I don't doubt that she is justified in feeling aggrieved.
I can't help though, but notice the anger in her words throughout her blog, and i understand them more than anyone who has not read my whole blog can possibly imagine. I can understand her anger, and so much of it reminds me of the beginning of my blog, and how i felt back then. I can completely empathise with that anger...SO i know from experience, how much forgiveness can heal. I no longer carry that anger with me.
Forgiveness does not condone another's actions. It does not mean what they did was ok. Forgiveness is not for the person we are forgiving, it is for ourselves. It does not mean that we like the person that we are forgiving, or that we want anything to do with them...It just takes away their power to hurt us any longer.
I didn't believe this about forgiveness either, for the longest time, and i continued to harbour grudges and hate towards people that had hurt me...the irony in that though, is that the only person that i was hurting in doing that - was me.
You really don't anything about survival of sexual abuse do you ? There is no need to forgive the pervert to be healed: healing is about the survivor learning to love themselves again. Saying a survivor should forgive their victim is as silly as saying the partners of 9/11 victims should forgive Osama Bin Laden.
Would also warn you about taking Gotcha as a model until you learn a little more about it's author.
An interesting discussion Jacqueline, thank you.
However, could I just state that I have not received ten years of counselling... and as the previous lady said, I was "instructed by Police" to gain assistance from ACC due to a pending trial. They, like me, remain justifiably frustrated as the hoops ACC have made me jump through have impeded the case.
I appreciate you opening this up for debate and, unlike some people, I am not offended by your opinion.
JAX
John - I can't say that i am all that experienced with the topic of sexual abuse. No. You got me there. I can say though, that i have 28 years worth of experience in dealing with anger, hate, blame, feeling like i am worthless, hating myself, and of not forgiving the people that i perceived as having caused those feelings inside me. The only place that being unforgiving, and angry landed me was living a life of unhappiness and shame...which was well publicised so i don't need to go there!
It is common knowledge that our brains have the ability to block out traumatising events. Our brains do this to protect us. When i was 10 years old, i had to stand up in court and choose between my mother and my father. I remember everything about that day - except for actually sitting before the judge and telling him that i wanted to live with my Dad. I have been told that is what i had to do...but i don't remember it. I don't remember it, most likely for a reason...because it is a harmful memory that my brain protects me from.
In some ways, i think that counselling, and bringing all these bad, evil, and awful memories to the surface would be like going against our brain's natural protective mechanism.
I am a true believer though, that we all have very different life experiences that bring us to believe and think the way that we do, and Jax's experiences will be different from every single one of our own...so what might work for her...may not be what works for others. Perhaps ACC and Doctors like Peter Jansen should keep that in mind when they are making decisions that can either have such a negative or positive impact on someone's wellbeing and future.
Jax i am sorry if i got the 10 years worth of counselling thing wrong. I thought i had read that on your blog. Apologies. Nothing i have said has been meant to offend you. I find you to be an interesting, intelligent, and very funny lady. I can relate to the anger that i feel when i read some of your blog posts, and my advice re forgiveness is not meant to be anything more than a comment regarding what worked for me.
People told me to forgive, for years...and my response had been something along the lines of "f*ck that they don't deserve my forgiveness" ...but i can honestly say, that when i let go of that attitude, and learned to forgive, i let go of every bit of anger, hate, and shame that i had held on to and carried with me for so long.
I see in your someone who has had so much of her life wasted being unhappy because of someone else's horrible actions, and i was just trying to express what worked for me, and what changed that for me.
But like John says - i have no experience with sexual abuse treatment.
I find this whole topic so interesting though, just because of the fact that i think good on you for speaking out the way you have. Like i said, if people treat others with respect, they will have no reason to be scared of googling their name. People don't purposely seek out anyone to "defame"..and if you are speaking the truth then you have every right to voice YOUR OWN opinion and experiences on YOUR OWN blog.
And for what it's worth - any ex who would phone ML the way that man did, is a repulsive human being. No wonder he is your ex...good riddance. Anyone that heard that, and didn't think the same, needs their head read.
Thank you JS...
http://k1w1jax.blogspot.com/2011/04/search-for-truth-consequence.html
Post a Comment